Re: [GRG] NIH Spends ~$6K per Capita per Year in Research Dollars for the Top Ten Causes of Death

The NIH budget it not $6k per capita per year, but rather just
$80 a year. The $6K a year is what we spend on US medical care based on the $80
in gov research. And a little more than that in private research.

 

It’s not formally the NIH’s job to prevent at least half
of accidents. There are 180,000 accidental deaths a year, for example, and
a sixth of these are due (each) to
automobiles, firearms, unintentional falls, poisonings
(usually accidental, but also includes suicides), and the rest are mainly
misadventures with alcohol poisoning (this doesn’t include injury), and other
drugs (both legal and illegal). Most of these come in contact the
medical system only in treatment, as there’s not much medicine can do about
prevention (the NHTSA handles autos, for example, and OSHA and other
agencies handle falls).  

 

The other causes below are indeed skewed as to cause.
Most renal failure in the US is due to uncontrolled hypertension, but this
is listed separately. The NIH’s NIDDK likes that, as they get the
money and not the NHLBI. These alphabets are little institutes that make up
the National Institutes of Health (NIH).  The NIDDK stands for National
Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney diseases, and NHLBI is
National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute.

 

Hypertension contributes sizable chunks of stroke and heart
disease, also and the appropriate fraction of those deaths should be listed with
hypertension, not the final outcome of it. After all, we
don’t list people with cancer who die of pneumonia with “pneumonia” deaths, as
we realize the cancer caused the pneumonia and the NCI (cancer
institute) claims them, not the NIAID (infectious diseases). But we do a
lot of other stuff that is about as bad. Multifactorial diseases need to be
split up into the major causes we know about.

 

All of this is too bad, as hypertension is one of the
simplest, easiest, and cheapest medical conditions to treat and publicly
fund. The consequences of it, however are organ failures that are very
resistant to doing anything about.

 

Smoking is also ignored in this table. Isn’t that
odd? Some 90% of COPD is due to smoking, yet COPD is listed as a
separate cause of death (which keeps the NHLBI happy, again) instead of the
smoking that caused it. With significant contributions of smoking to cancer and
cardiovascular disease, ignored smoking causes 19% of total US deaths (!).

 

Alcohol-death, by contrast, is listed under the
poisoning and drug-related deaths, but the 19% of total US deaths due to
smoking are somehow neither considered drug-related OR accidents. Why? The NIH
has its own branch for alcoholism (NIAAA), and that may be part of the
reason. But there is no NIH institute for smoking!

 

Smoking certainly deserves its own category of causality,
since it causes (in the US) about 480,000 deaths a year, and on that number
alone properly should be the THIRD leading cause of death behind cancer and
heart disease (each about 600,000 per year). Worse still, if you subtract the
cancers and heart disease caused by smoking
(roughly 100,000 each) you get the three causes of death in the US all at
about the same number each (half a million a year). So the three leading causes
(non-smoking cancer, non-smoking cardiovascular (CV) disease, smoking and the
diseases it causes) are neck-and-neck in numbers, and the all other causes are
far behind these three leading horses of the death apocalypse.

 

These numbers (quite independent of aging) are necessary
to document correctly, as they tend to skew perception. For example, we all know
that some of the worst life expectancies in the US as in the states where
tobacco is grown, and in fact smoking explains 50% of the discrepancy in life
expectancy between the US North and South. But all of this discrepancy has been
blamed on racism, bad medical care, and other factors. An understanding that
tobacco actually does kill as many people every year as 1) non-tobacco related
CV disease and 2) non-tobacco related cancer, would mean that smoking-cessation
would receive top government research priority along with CV and cancer, and
e-cigarettes and the more powerful personal vaporizers (PVs) would get as
much funding as we spend on cancer and heart disease. We know how to stop most
smoking. An all out war is needed. It doesn’t happen.

 

Some of the same is true of dollars spent on fighting cancer
and heart disease. Cancer subtracts about 2 years from the US life span, while
cardiovascular diseases takes at least 10 (mostly because CV strikes in
middle age, while nearly all cancer strikes late). Yet we spend about equal
money on both. Even assuming both CV disease and cancer are equally hard
problems, we should get 5 times the bang per buck preventing CV disease. So we
should be spending more money there. We know that cancer is a hundred different
diseases anyway, while CV disease is only a few. That’s just another reason to
spend more research dollars on CV until we whip it.

 

What about aging? We’re all agreed that cancer is probably a
proxy for aging, and so is a lot of CV disease, and that if we slowed aging we
could slow the others at the same time. The problem with this argument is that
it fails to come to grips with the fact that aging is a really, really hard
problem, far harder than cancer. Clearly a lot of money spent gives little
program on aging. Since we do not know how much harder it is to slow aging
than to slow or cure cancer (only that we can sometimes do the latter, but not
the former in humans) we don’t really know what the correct ratio of money spent
should be.

 

But for the end-diseases discussed above, we’re clearly
not doing very well. Smoking cessation and hypertension control are the ugly
stepchildren of American medical care, neglected in research and in care, left
to the badly-paid primary care people (themselves ugly ducklings). While the
largest bucks of the $2.4 trillion medical care system, and even the
research dollars, are spent on scientists who study, and specialists
who treat the *consequences* of hypertension and smoking. Go
figure.

 

SBH

 

 

 

 

 

Advertisements

About Johnny Adams

My full-time commitment is to slow and ultimately reverse age related functional decline to increase healthy years of life. I’ve been active in this area since the 1970s, steadily building skills and accomplishments. I have a good basic understanding of the science of aging, and have many skills that complement those of scientists so they can focus on science to advance our shared mission. Broad experience Top skills: administration, management, information technology (data and programming), communications, writing, marketing, market research and analysis, public speaking, forging ethical win-win outcomes among stakeholders (i.e. high level "selling"). Knowledge in grant writing, fundraising, finance. Like most skilled professionals, I’m best described as a guy who defines an end point, then figures out how to get there. I enjoy the conception, design, execution and successful completion of a grand plan. Executive Director Gerontology Research Group (GRG). Manages Email discussion forum, web site, meetings and oversees supercentenarian (oldest humans, 110+ years) research. CEO / Executive Director Carl I. Bourhenne Medical Research Foundation (Aging Intervention Foundation), an IRS approved 501(c)(3) nonprofit. http://www.AgingIntervention.org Early contributor to Supercentenarian Research Foundation. Co-Founder Geroscience Healthspan Forum. Active contributor to numerous initiatives to increase healthy years of life. Co-authored book on conventional, practical methods available today to slow the processes of aging – nutrition, exercise, behavior modification and motivation, stress reduction, proper supplementation, damage caused by improper programs, risk reduction and others. Fundamental understanding of, and experience in the genomics of longevity (internship analyzing and curating longevity gene papers). Biological and technical includes information technology, software development and computer programming, bioinformatics and protein informatics, online education, training programs, regulatory, clinical trials software, medical devices (CAT scanners and related), hospital electrical equipment testing program. Interpersonal skills – good communication, honest, well liked, works well in teams or alone. Real world experience collaborating in interdisciplinary teams in fast paced organizations. Uses technology to advance our shared mission. Education: MBA 1985 University of Southern California -- Deans List, Albert Quon Community Service Award (for volunteering with the American Longevity Association and helping an elderly lady every other week), George S. May Scholarship, CA State Fellowship. BA psychology, psychobiology emphasis 1983 California State University Fullerton Physiological courses as well as core courses (developmental, abnormal etc). UCLA Psychobiology 1978, one brief but fast moving and fulfilling quarter. Main interest was the electrochemical basis of consciousness. Also seminars at the NeuroPsychiatric Institute. Other: Ongoing conferences, meetings and continuing education. Aging, computer software and information technology. Some molecular biology, biotech, bio and protein informatics, computer aided drug design, clinical medical devices, electronics, HIPAA, fundraising through the Assoc. of Fundraising Professionals. Previous careers include: Marketing Increasing skill set and successes in virtually all phases, with valuable experience in locating people and companies with the greatest need and interest in a product or service, and sitting across the table with decision makers and working out agreements favorable to all. Information Technology: Management, data analysis and programming in commercial and clinical trials systems, and bioinformatics and protein informatics. As IT Director at Newport Beach, CA based technology organization Success Family of Continuing Education Companies, provided online software solutions for insurance and financial professionals in small to Fortune 500 size companies. We were successful with lean team organization (the slower moving competition was unable to create similar software systems). Medical devices: At Omnimedical in Paramount CA developed and managed quality assurance dept. and training depts. for engineers, physicians and technicians. Designed hospital equipment testing program for hospital services division. In my early 20’s I was a musician, and studied psychology and music. Interned with the intention of becoming a music therapist. These experiences helped develop valuable skills used today to advance our shared mission of creating aging solutions.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s